This article focuses on the key criteria that can be most overlooked; intention to create legal relationships. As far as social agreements are concerned, there is no presumption and the case is decided exclusively in its case. The intention to create legal relations shows the intention of the parties to conclude a legally binding agreement. This shows that the parties are prepared to accept the legal consequences of the agreement, which means that they are serious. Where an agreement is a trade agreement, the parties generally intend to make it legally binding. Even if it is not presumed that such an intention exists, it will generally not be difficult for the applicant to prove this element. The intention to be legally bound is an essential element of a valid and enforceable contract. This means that all contracting parties must accept the contractual terms with the intention of establishing a legally binding relationship.3 min. However, intent remains an independent requirement and must be demonstrated separately, and there are cases where there has been consideration but no contract has been established because that condition has not been met. The courts have confirmed before the marital agreements between couples who will marry just before the marriage, which will happen in the event of a divorce from their property.
The relevant category for a particular agreement depends on the intent of the parties, but terms such as «in accordance with the contract» or «subject to the preparation of a formal contract» suggest that the parties do not intend to be bound, except pending the signing of a formal contract (paragraph 13, page 363). Despite these general assumptions, it is still open to the parties to specify whether they wish their agreements to have a contractual effect. It is presumed that family agreements do not create legal relationships unless there is clear evidence to the contrary. The courts oppose agreements that, for political reasons, should not be legally applicable.  Transit systems, in which colleagues offer elevators to and from work to each other, are also concluded without worry, with no intention of creating legal relationships. It is thought that the situation is close to a friendship agreement and not a contractual commercial windfall. This agreement has not entered into force as a formal or legal agreement and this memorandum is not written, nor is it subject to jurisdiction in the courts of the United States or England, but it is merely a concrete expression and a recording of the purpose and intent of the three parties concerned, to which they all commit themselves with honour, with confidence. , based on previous operations. they are of each of the three parties with mutual loyalty and friendly cooperation.
Where an agreement is a trade agreement, the parties generally intend to make it legally binding. In such a case, it will be difficult to show anything else. Again, the intent review is objective. If the parties to a trade agreement do not provide for it to be binding, they can use so-called «honour clauses» to emphasize that the agreement is binding only in its honour, not in law.